Mallett and Son (Antiques) Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd and another; Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd and another (Record no. 76781)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02088cab a2200229 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field ##L133062
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 060406n2006 000 0 eng u
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u133062
041 #0 - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Mallett and Son (Antiques) Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd and another; Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd and another
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2006
490 #0 - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Estates Gazette
Volume/sequential designation [2006] 13 EG 140 (CS) (1)
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Estates Gazette
Volume/sequential designation [2006] 26 EG 156 (5)
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. CA, 21 March 2006. Considers whether the tenants of two properties should be prevented from acquiring the freeholds on the basis that the properties were not houses within the meaning of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1967 s2(1). M and B who used the originally residential properties for commercial purposes brought actions in the county court after they were refused their leasehold enfranchisement rights but the judge held that the properties were not houses within the s2(1) meaning of the Act when the notices were served. M and B appealed arguing that both properties had originally been designed for living in and had retained that character or configuration with the freeholders countering that the judge had applied the correct test of whether the properties had been designed for living in at the relevant time. "Held": appeals dismissed. The judge concluded that neither property was a house designed for living in for the purposes of the leasehold enfranchisement provisions of the Act. Under s2(1) of the Act it was necessary to consider whether a property satisfied the definition of house at the time which the notice of the tenant's claim had been served.
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note IKA110406
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element MALLETT AND SONS (ANTIQUES) LTD V GROSVENOR WEST END PROPERTIES LTD AND ANOTHER
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element BOSS HOLDINGS LTD V GROSVENOR WEST END PROPERTIES LTD AND ANOTHER
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 S2(1)
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element COMMONHOLD AND LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 2002
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     London London Journal article 06/04/2006   L133602 133062-1001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Journal article