Joyce v St Albans D C (Record no. 76789)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01927cab a2200181 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ##L133070 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 060407n2006 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u133070 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Joyce v St Albans D C |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2006 |
| 490 #0 - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Rating and Valuation Reporter |
| Volume/sequential designation | 2006, 106-112(7) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | ACQ/51/2004, 28 September 2005. Claimant (J) sought compensation for a freehold dwelling house which was compulsorily purchased by the council (S). In 1998 J had received a renovation grant for the property, one of the conditions of which was that works had to be completed within 12 months. Although this time limit was later extended, S eventually acquired the house compulsorily, and sold the property in two lots. J assessed the value of the property in its dilapidated condition as £270 000, as opposed to S's figure of £218 000, and also contended that, under the Land Compensation Act 1961, s9, she was entitled to the difference between the value of the property in a refurbished condition and that in its actual state, or alternatively compensation in the amount of the renovation grant which she would have received had the property not been compulsorily purchased. "Held" J was entitled to compensation of £240 000 (reasons given); the claim under the Land Compensation Act was dismissed as from the evidence and correspondence J had been unable to prove her contention that the property would have been in good condition at the valuation date had S complied with its obligations; her alternative contention was also rejected as there was no evidence to support the claim that she would eventually have received a grant had the compulsory purchase not gone ahead. A claim for home loss payment was also rejected. |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | JOYCE V ST ALBANS DC |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LAND COMPENSATION ACT 1961 |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-PROPERTY VALUATION AND APPRAISAL-COMPENSATION VALUATION |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 07/04/2006 | L133070 | 133070-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |