Alliance Spring Co Ltd and others v. The First Secretary of State (Record no. 78314)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01768cab a2200181 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L136492 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 070205n2005 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u136492 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Alliance Spring Co Ltd and others v. The First Secretary of State |
| Medium | [electronic resource] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2005 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2005] EWCH 15 (Admin), 18 January 2005. Planning permission had been granted for a scheme involving the relocation of a football stadium in North London. Some of the land was not owned by the local authority or football club and a compulsory purchase order was made, the main justification for which was that it was needed to achieve a comprehensive regeneration scheme. The claimants argued that this was not the case and that it was simply devised to satisfy the football club's desire for a new stadium. "Held": it was decided that the local authority was entitled to make use of the football club's desire to have a new stadium to produce and promote a scheme which it regarded as a comprehensive redevelopment of the area in the public interest. There was no precedent for a stadium-led regeneration scheme but the fact that the scheme was led by and to a large extent dependent on a private developer was no reason why it should be rejected. The secretary of state was entitled to conclude that the scheme was intended to achieve a comprehensive and desirable redevelopment of a deprived area and the claimants' application was refused. |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ALLIANCE SPRING CO LTD AND OTHERS V FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S226 |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | LONDON |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2005/18.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2005/18.html</a> |
| Public note | View the decision free of charge at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 05/02/2007 | ONLINE PUBLICATION | 136492-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |