Haycocks and another v. Neville and another (Record no. 78325)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01573cab a2200193 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L136515 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 070205n2007 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u136515 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Haycocks and another v. Neville and another |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2007 |
| 490 00 - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | (0704) 27 January 2007 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2007] 04 EG 186 (CS), 18 January 2007. The appellants and the respondents were the registered owners of adjoining properties on a housing development. The respondents had purchased their property from the developer following completion of the development in 1992, while the appellants had purchased their house from the original owner. A dispute arose over the boundary between the properties, centering on the precise location of a "piovot point" where the line of the boundary turned at an angle. "Held": As the plans on the registered title were of little use, being imprecise as to the boundaries and on too small a scale to be helpful, the judge in the original case had also taken additional evidence into account including what the parties had done and features placed on the ground. Despite the fact that the original judge had not taken into account the method for boundary determination of either the appellants or the respondents, it was found that this was an acceptable way to make the necessary decision. The appeal was dismissed. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | KA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | HAYCOCKS AND ANOTHER V NEVILLE AND ANOTHER |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | England |
| Chronological subdivision | 886- |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT-BOUNDARY DETERMINATION |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 05/02/2007 | L136515 | 136515-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |