Hicks Development Ltd v. Chaplin and others (Record no. 78407)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01727cab a2200193 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L136702 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 070215n2007 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u136702 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Hicks Development Ltd v. Chaplin and others |
| Medium | [electronic resource] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2007 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2007] EWHC 141 (Ch), 5 February 2007. The appellant development company (Hicks) appealed against a decision that the respondents (Chaplins') had acquired title to a strip of land by adverse possession. The strip consisted of a narrow ditch and a line of vegetation separating the Chaplins' driveway from a small housing development. The strip had originally formed part of a larger property which Hicks had developed by constructing a row of houses with gardens abutting the strip. The gardens were separated from the strip by a fence erected by . At trial, the Chaplins' case had been that the fence represented the true boundary and that, believing themselves to be the owners of the strip they had removed dead trees from it, planted fresh trees and shrubs and had generally maintained it. Hicks argued that the Chaplins' had been given implied permission to use the land and therefore they could not claim that there was ever a mistake regarding ownership of the land. "Held": it was decided that the respondents had never had implied permission and that the adjudicator's determination in favour of them was correct. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | KA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | HICKS DEVELOPMENT LTD V CHAPLIN AND OTHERS |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | England |
| Chronological subdivision | 886- |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT-BOUNDARY DETERMINATION |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2007/141.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2007/141.html</a> |
| Public note | View the decision at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 15/02/2007 | ONLINE PUBLICATION | 136702-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |