Jerry Jezierski v Dennis Patrick Osbourne (Valuations Officer) (Record no. 78547)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02106cab a22002175a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L137090 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 070314e2007 xxk 000 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u137090 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Jerry Jezierski v Dennis Patrick Osbourne (Valuations Officer) |
| Medium | [electronic resource] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2007 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2006] EWLands RA_27_2006, 14 December 2006. An appeal by the ratepayer, Mr Jerry Jezierski, against the decision of the London South East Valuation Tribunal, confirming the assessment in the 2000 rating list of a shop. Mr Jezierski had no objection in principle to the value of £7,700. However as the result of subsequent events, he wished to pursue his appeal against the Valuation Tribunal's determination and seek a lower valuation. A surveyor approached Mr Jezierski, suggesting that the rates payable on his property were too high and promised to secure a substantial reduction if he were instructed to lodge a proposal. Mr Jezierski was visited by a representative of the Valuation Officer, who wished to re-measure the premises. Subsequently, the Valuation Officer made a proposal to increase the assessment of the appeal hereditament to RV £8,300 based on fact that the re-calculated floor area was greater than that on which the compiled list assessment had been based. Mr Jezierski's argument was that the Valuation Officer has not valued the property having regard to the way the floor space is actually used in connection with his business in alternative medicine. "Held": the appeal hereditament falls to be based on rental evidence and not other rating assessments. The judge found that the rateable value of £7,700 in the list was not excessive. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | KA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | FUTURES LONDON V STRATFORD |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | WILLIAM V SCOTTISH AND NEWCASTLE RETAIL |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | JEZIERSKI V VALUATION OFFICER |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | LONDON |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TAXATION-BUSINESS RATES |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWLands/2006/RA_27_2006.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWLands/2006/RA_27_2006.html</a> |
| Public note | View the item free of charge at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 14/03/2007 | ONLINE PUBLICATION | 137090-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |