Jones V Garnett (HMIT) (Record no. 79112)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01827cad a22002055a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L139865 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 110516e20070725xxk f w 000 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u139865 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Jones V Garnett (HMIT) |
| Medium | [electronic resource] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2007 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2007] UKHL 35, 25 July 2007. The Revenue (G) appealed against a decision that arrangements which the respondent company owner (J) had with his wife had not amounted to a settlement within the meaning of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act s660A(1). J's wife provided administrative support to his computer consultancy company. J was appointed sole director with his wife as secretary. On their accountant's advice, both drew low salaries and distributed the income between them as dividends. G argued that this amounted to a settlement, and that shares in the company given to his wife for the nominal sum of £1 had not been an outright gift within the meaning of the Act. "Held": The Act had defined a settlement quite broadly, and through the introduction of the concept of bounty. Since J's wife had received considerably more worth than her payment of £1 it was unavoidable that there had been a distinct settlement. Once this was accepted it was difficult to avoid the conclusion that a gift had been made. Once this was decided, the definition of an outright gift was no longer helpful. Appeal dismissed. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | KA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | INCOME AND CORPORATION TAXES ACT 1988 |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | JONES V GARNETT (HMIT) (2007) |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | England and Wales |
| Chronological subdivision | 1543- |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | MANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT-BUSINESS TAXATION |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldjudgmt/jd070725/jones%20-1.htm">https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldjudgmt/jd070725/jones%20-1.htm</a> |
| Public note | View the judgement free of charge at www.publications.parliament.uk |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 16/08/2007 | ONLINE PUBLICATION | 139865-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |