Duke of Westminster (deceased) and another v Regis Group (Barclays) Ltd (Record no. 79280)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01778cab a22002055a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L140476 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 070925e20070922xxk f v 000 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u140476 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Duke of Westminster (deceased) and another v Regis Group (Barclays) Ltd |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2007 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2007] LRA 82 2006, 2 May 2007. Considered whether the price paid for a leasehold enfranchisement should reflect the premium to be paid as a special purchaser for the merger of two leasehold interests. The appellants (W) were freeholders in two mews properties. The price paid for the second had included a sum to reflect the diminution of value due to loss of opportunity to dispose of the two properties together. W contracted to sell the remainder of the lease and the right to acquire freehold under the Act. In an enfranchisement claim by the respondent (R), W contended for a sum to reflect the premium they would pay for the merger of freehold interests. The leasehold valuation tribunal ruled that W had already been compensated for any loss on enfranchisement. W appealed against this decision. "Held": Valuations under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s9(1A) did not make presumption that the seller had knowledge of any purchaser?s special interest. At the valuation date W had not known of R's offer for the lease, so no special purchaser?s premium was payable. Appeal dismissed. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | KA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | DUKE OF WESTMINSTER V REGIS GROUP |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | England and Wales |
| Chronological subdivision | 1543- |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.landstribunal.gov.uk/aspx/view.aspx?id=431">https://www.landstribunal.gov.uk/aspx/view.aspx?id=431</a> |
| Public note | View the judgment free of charge at www.landstribunal.gov.uk... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 25/09/2007 | ONLINE PUBLICATION | 140476-2001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |