Rush and Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council and P J Carey Plant Hire (Oval) Ltd (Record no. 7937)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01525cab a2200193 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS38795 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u12420 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Rush and Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council and P J Carey Plant Hire (Oval) Ltd |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1988 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | New Law Journal |
| Volume/sequential designation | 138(6341) 29 January 1988, 22-23(2) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | CA 21 December 1987. Appeal by second defendant (P) against official referee`s decision in favour of plaintiff (R) who claimed that `without prejudice` correspondence which had passed between R and the first defendant G was privileged. P had applied for discovery of the documents. R had entered into a contract with G for the construction of 639 dwellings. P were engaged as subcontractors. When a dispute arose R commenced proceedings against G and P. When an agreement was reached between R and G, P applied for discovery of the without prejudice correspondence leading up to the agreement. R contended that the correspondence was privileged because it had been written without prejudice and the official referee upheld R`s claim. On appeal, the rule concerning privilege of without prejudice documents and the meaning of `without prejudice` was considered. CA concluded that 1) the privilege afforded by the correspondence between R and G came to an end when that correspondence came to fruitio |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | CUTTS V HEAD |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS38795 | 12420-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |