Laskar v Laskar (Record no. 79910)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01879cab a22002415a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L142675 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 080227e20080223xxk f 000 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u142675 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | O'Grady, Eileen |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Laskar v Laskar |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2008 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | (0807) 23 February 2008, 142(1) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2008] PLSCS 35, 7 February 2008. Reports on case considering whether a right to buy exercised by a tenant and ex-tenant could result in a jointly owned property with equal shares. The respondent and her husband were secure tenants of a local authority property. When her husband left, the respondent transferred the tenancy solely to herself. As sole tenant she exercised her right to buy, but the appellant, the respondent's daughter, offered to assist with a mortgage in both their names. The property was to be let and the mortgage paid with the income. After a quarrel, the appellant applied to court for a declaration of her interest. This was set at well below the value of her contribution. She appealed, arguing that there was a presumption of joint ownership, the right-to-buy discount was an entitlement of both parties, and both parties were entitled to equal shares. "Held": The burden of proof was on the respondent to show that beneficial interests were not equal. The home had been purchased as an investment. The discount was attributable only on the respondent's length of tenancy. The mortgage was to be treated as an equal contribution of each party. Appeal allowed. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | KA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LASKAR V LASKAR |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | STACK V DOWDEN |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | HOUSING ACT 1985 PART V |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | United Kingdom |
| Chronological subdivision | |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 27/02/2008 | L142675 | 142675-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |