MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01879cad a22002295a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER |
|---|
| control field |
L143460 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
080513e20080319xxk f v 000 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER |
|---|
| System control number |
(Sirsi) u143460 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE |
|---|
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title |
eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Oun v Ahmad |
| Medium |
[electronic resource] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
2008 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
[2008] EWHC 545 (Ch), 19 March 2008. Considers whether legal rectification is available where parties have executed a document and then discovered a mistake as to the legal consequences of the document. The appellant (O) had agreed to sell the lease of a mixed use property to the respondent (X). An agreement was drawn up, but following additional concerns raised by X a second contract was created relating to a further sum to be paid on completion for the trading stock. There was disagreement regarding the completion of the contracts. O applied for a unilateral notice of title and X objected. O appealed against the adjudicator's decision that no common mistake was represented and that rectification was unavailable. "Held": For there to be a binding contract of sale, the written agreement would have to represent the full intentions of both parties. If this was not the case then prima facie there was no binding contract. An express agreement to omit terms meant that rectification to the contract was not available, as the contract as drawn up was not in error. Therefore O was not in possession of a binding agreement and rectification was unavailable. Appeal dismissed. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) |
|---|
| Local note |
KA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
OUN V AHMAD |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
LAW OF PROPERTY (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1989 S2 |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
WILLS V GIBBS |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
ALLNUTT V WILDING |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME |
|---|
| Geographic name |
England and Wales |
| Chronological subdivision |
1543- |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
PROPERTY-ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
|---|
| Uniform Resource Identifier |
<a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2008/545.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2008/545.html</a> |
| Public note |
View the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Suppress in OPAC |
0 |
