Dunlop Haywards (DHL) Ltd and another v Erinaceous Insurance Services Ltd and another (Record no. 80214)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02240cad a22002295a 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field L143556
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 080519e20080401xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u143556
041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Dunlop Haywards (DHL) Ltd and another v Erinaceous Insurance Services Ltd and another
Medium [electronic resource]
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2008
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. [2008] EWHC 520 (Comm), 1 April 2008. Considers whether an insurance broker was barred from complaints against another by estoppel, and whether excess insurers should be included as defendants. The claimant property company (D) was facing claims for negligence or possible mortgage fraud over valuations. D's excess insurers (M) stated their PII cover did not extend to property valuations. D instigated proceedings against their brokers (H), who had instructed a Lloyd's broker (F) to place the cover. H argued that F was therefore culpable. F argued that H was estopped from such complaint as they had approved the insurance slip, applied for the case against it to be struck out. H further argued that the valuation was included in the policy by construction, or alternatively that the policy should be amended retroactively. H applied for M be added to the claim as defendants under the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 rule 19.2. "Held": The court have power to add M as a defendant using rule 19.2, in the absence of a Part 20 claim. However it was unnecessary as the relevant action was not yet clear, and H could instigate proceedings against M if this became necessary. D could reasonably make claim against H who in turn was not estopped from complaints against F's placing of the insurance. Applications refused.
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note KA
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element PINDOS SHIPPING CORPORATION V RAVEN (THE MATA HARI)
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element DUNLOP HAYWARDS (DHL) LTD V ERINACEOUS INSURANCE SERVICES LTD
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES 1998
651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME
Geographic name United Kingdom
Chronological subdivision
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element MANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-INSURANCE
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FINANCE AND INVESTMENT-MORTGAGING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-MORTGAGE VALUATION
856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2008/520.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2008/520.html</a>
Public note View the item free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     Virtual Virtual Online 19/05/2008   ONLINE PUBLICATION 143556-1001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Law report