Strachey v Ramage (Record no. 80244)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01772cad a22002175a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L143604 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 080521e20080418xxk f v 000 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u143604 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Strachey v Ramage |
| Medium | [electronic resource] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2008 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2008] EWCA Civ 384, 18 April 2008. Considers the legal principles relevant to a boundary dispute neighbouring landowners. The appellant (S) and respondent (R) were in possession of areas of land which had been in common ownership before being sold to their predecessor landowners. Since 1988 a fence had served as the physical boundary between the parcels of land. However the 2008 conveyancing document described a boundary which gave R more land. S had argued that the conveyance was for the purposes of identification only and was not to be construed as an exact boundary distinction. Further, that in any case she and her predecessor had been in adverse possession for over 12 years. The judge found for R on both counts, and S appealed. "Held": The conveyancing document's plan did not follow any physical feature for the division of the parcels of land. Accordingly it could not be used to determine the case. The judge had misdirected himself as to the applicable principles. A clause in the conveyance provided the answer, which was that the fence marked the boundary. Appeal allowed. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | KA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | STRACHEY V RAMAGE |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | WILLSON V GREENE |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | WIGGINTON & MILNER LTD V WINSTER ENGINEERING LTD |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | England and Wales |
| Chronological subdivision | 1543- |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT-BOUNDARY DETERMINATION |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/384.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/384.html</a> |
| Public note | View the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 21/05/2008 | ONLINE PUBLICATION | 143604-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |