Regus (UK) Ltd v Epcot Solutions Ltd (Record no. 80253)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01819cad a22001935a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L143691 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 080527e20080415xxk f 000 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u143691 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Regus (UK) Ltd v Epcot Solutions Ltd |
| Medium | [electronic resource] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2008 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2008] EWCA Civ 361, 15 April 2008. Considered whether a term in a contract for the supply of serviced office accommodation which excluded liabilities for loss was enforceable under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977. The appellant landlord (R) appealed against a decision (L138693) that a clause in its standard contract was unfair under section 11 of the Act. The defendant tenant (E) had been awarded damages for loss of business due to the need to relocate as a result of a persistently faulty air conditioning system which R failed to repair. R appealed against the decision. E submitted that even if the clause left room for remedy by a reduction in fees paid to R, this was unfair as R had caused the situation by wilfully failing to repair the faulting air conditioning. "Held": The judge had been wrong to rule the clause as unreasonable, since it left E with no legal remedy to the situation. The clause did not exclude wilful or malicious damages, a course of remedy still open to E in the light of financially measurable consequences. R advised its customers to insure themselves against business loss, and this was consistent with its contract. Appeal allowed. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | KA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | REGUS (UK) LTD V EPCOT SOLUTIONS LTD |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | England and Wales |
| Chronological subdivision | 1543- |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/361.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/361.html</a> |
| Public note | View the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 27/05/2008 | ONLINE PUBLICATION | 143691-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |