Eyestorm Limited v Hoptonacre Homes Ltd (Record no. 80429)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01981cad a22002775a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L144340 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 080711e20071203xxk f v 000 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u144340 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Eyestorm Limited v Hoptonacre Homes Ltd |
| Medium | [electronic resource] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2007 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2007] EWCA Civ 1366, 3 December 2007. Appellant company (E) appealed against the rejection of its claim for damages for breach of contract and return of a deposit paid to developers (H). Agreement created whereby E would purchase the leases to a block of flats from H if it was unable to sub-let them after an agreed time, hoping to sell at a profit. The relationship broke down; E was unable to sublet any of the properties and witheld monies in an attempt to re-negotiate the agreement. H eventually rescinded the agreement (after marketing the properties independently) and witheld the deposit paid by E as forfeit. E stated that H was in breach of contract for marketing the flats independently and that H had prevented E gaining access to the properties for valuation purposes. Held: appeal dismissed as there was no identifiable legal basis for asserting that the respondent was in breach of contract. Even if such a breach could have been established, it would not have caused the appellant loss. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | KA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | EYESTORM LTD V HOPTONACRE HOMES LTD |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LAW OF PROPERTY (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1989 |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PROSPER HOMES LTD V HAMBROS BANK EXECUTOR AND TRUSTEE CO LTD |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MCCAUSLAND AND ANOTHER V DUNCAN LAWRIE LTD AND ANOTHER |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | OMAR V EL-WAKIL |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TREGO V HUNT |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | YAXLEY V GOTTS AND ANOTHER |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | United Kingdom |
| Chronological subdivision | |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | MANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2008/556.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2008/556.html</a> |
| Public note | View the case free of charge online at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 11/07/2008 | ONLINE PUBLICATION | 144340-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |