Sutcliffe v Lloyd and another (Record no. 80437)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01785cad a22001935a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L144348 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 080714e20080609xxk f v 000 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u144348 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Sutcliffe v Lloyd and another |
| Medium | [electronic resource] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2008 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2008] EWCH 1329 (Ch).The case shows that the amount awarded by a court may be much less than a claimant might expect. The case also highlights the importance of drafting comprehensive dispute resolution clauses in construction contracts. The case was heard by the High Court on appeal from [2007] EWCA Civ 153 (L138245). Two property developers Sutcliffe (S) and Lloyd (L) worked together on a residential property development scheme, buying land and obtaining planning permission. S claimed a large sum in damages after L went ahead without him. The court had to determine the level of damages payable to a party for being incorrectly excluded from a development project. Held: S had been wrongly excluded from the final project. However, S had not funded the project which was not successful, or taken any risks. In addition, he had done other profitable work instead, and so was not justified in making a claim for an equal share of the profit. The court awarded compensation for monies spent on the project (i.e. minimum equity). This was a fraction of the amount claimed, and probably far less than the legal costs of bringing the case. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | KA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | SUTCLIFFE V LLOYD |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | England and Wales |
| Chronological subdivision | 1543- |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2008/1329.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2008/1329.html</a> |
| Public note | View the judgment free of charge at www.baiili.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 14/07/2008 | ONLINE PUBLICATION | 144348-2001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |