Chilli Developments Ltd v Commission for the New Towns (Record no. 80509)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01758cad a22002175a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L144527 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 080725e20080618xxk f v 000 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u144527 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Chilli Developments Ltd v Commission for the New Towns |
| Medium | [electronic resource] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2008 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2008] EWHC 1310 (QB) 18 June 2008. Case found that the Commission for the New Towns had not breached exlusivity agreements with a developer (relating to the regeneration of docklands in Middlesborough) and had not acted in bad faith during the lifetime of the agreements. Claimant (C) claimed damages from purported breaches of lock-out or exclusivity agreements from Tees Valley Regeneration Ltd (T) (an urban regeneration body), asserting that T had induced the Commission to breach these agreements. The Commission argued that C had failed to bring its own development proposals to fruition, despite extension of the exclusivity agreements. Held: the defendants had acted in good faith throughout and claims that C had misled T as to the likelihood of entering a development agreement were not supported by documentary evidence. C had remained the preferred developer throughout, as was evinced by their willingness to enter into the initial agreements and to extend them despite the fact that agreements had not been met by T. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | KA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | CHILLI DEVELOPMENTS LTD V COMMISSION FOR THE NEW TOWNS |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | WALFORD V MILES |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PETROMEC INC V PETROLEO BRASILEIRO SA |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | England and Wales |
| Chronological subdivision | 1543- |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT-REGENERATION |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2008/1310.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2008/1310.html</a> |
| Public note | View the item free of charge at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 25/07/2008 | ONLINE PUBLICATION | 144527-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |