McDonalds Real Estate LLP v Arundel Corporation (Record no. 80569)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01741cab a22001935a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L144747 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 080807e20080802xxk f v 000 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u144747 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | McDonalds Real Estate LLP v Arundel Corporation |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2008 |
| 490 #0 - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | (830) 2 August 2008, 84-88(5) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Provides detailed case notes on McDonalds Real Estate v Arundel Corporation [2008] EWCH 377 (Ch), 16 January 2008. The case shows the potential problems involved in drafting rent review clauses based on hypothetical lettings. The court had to determine the assessment of rent on a rent review for a warehouse used as a drive-thru restaurant. In 1986, McDonalds took out a fifty year lease on an old factory with a view to converting it into a drive-through. The lease provided the building to be treated as a warehouse with 15% office space at rent review. The case turned on whether, where there were no suitable comparables, the open market rent of the restaurant should be determined on the basis of a retail warehouse. The landlord argued that warehouse could include retail warehouses, which generate a significantly higher rent than storage warehouses. The Court had to decide what sort of warehouse was intended. Held: claim allowed in part. A storage warehouse had been intended, but there was no restriction on the usage of the word. The landlord may seek to have the building's retail value reflected in the rent review. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | KA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MCDONALDS REAL ESTATE V ARUNDEL CORPORATION |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | England and Wales |
| Chronological subdivision | 1543- |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-RENT REVIEW (BUSINESS TENANCIES) |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 07/08/2008 | L144747 | 144747-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |