Field Common Ltd v Elmbridge Borough Council (Record no. 80878)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01954cab a22002295a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L145564 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 081021e20080827xxk f v 000 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u145564 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Field Common Ltd v Elmbridge Borough Council |
| Medium | [electronic resource] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2008 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Field Common Ltd v Elmbridge Borough Council [2008] EWHC 2079 (Ch), 27 August 2008. The case shows that constructing a road over another's land without permission may lead to the developer being liable for those who unlawfully use the road. The case concerned a case of trespass by a local council who tarmacked land without consent when widening a road and how the damages for the trespass should be assessed. Long negotiations to agree a purchase price for the land came to nothing. At an earlier hearing the court dismissed the council's claim to a prescriptive right of way. The council had trespassed and damages would be awarded to the landowner. The freeholder sought damages on the basis of what the authority would have had to pay if a right to use the land had been negotiated. Held: the High Court said the council had encouraged tenants of a nearby industrial estate to trespass on the landowners land and therefore damages should reflect the extra rent it could have charged with the benefit of the improved access road. The court left it to the two sides to agree a sum based on its rulings. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | KA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | FIELD COMMON LTD V ELMBRIDGE BOROUGH COUNCIL |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | HOLMES V WILSON |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | BLAKE V HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | EARL OF SEFTON V TOPHAMS LTD (NO2) |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | England and Wales |
| Chronological subdivision | 1543- |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Boundary disputes |
| 9 (RLIN) | 6221 |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2008/2079.html&query=title+(+field+)+and+title+(+common+)+and+title+(+v+)+and+title+(+elmbridge+)&method=boolean">https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2008/2079.html&query=title+(+field+)+and+title+(+common+)+and+title+(+v+)+and+title+(+elmbridge+)&method=boolean</a> |
| Public note | View the case free of charge at www.bailii.org |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 21/10/2008 | ONLINE PUBLICATION | 145564-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |