Scottish and Newcastle Plc (original respondents and cross-applicants) v Raguz (original appellant and cross-respondent) (Record no. 80940)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02156cad a22002295a 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field L145801
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 081110e20081029xxk 000 0 eng d
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u145801
041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
110 2# - MAIN ENTRY--CORPORATE NAME
Corporate name or jurisdiction name as entry element United Kingdom Parliament
Subordinate unit House of Lords
9 (RLIN) 3232
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Scottish and Newcastle Plc (original respondents and cross-applicants) v Raguz (original appellant and cross-respondent)
Medium [electronic resource]
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2008
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. [2008] UKHL 65, 29 October 2008. In a victory for common sense, landlords will no longer need to serve notices in respect of an outstanding rent review, thereby removing an administrative headache. The appellant appealed against a decision (see L13384 and L137096) that the scope of the indemnity under the Land Registration Act 1925 S24 was not limited to payments that the assignor was legally entitled to make. The respondent cross-appealed against the Court of Appeal's decision that certain rent review increases were irrecoverable because of a failure to serve S17 notices under the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995. At issue was when an increase under a rent review was to be treated as having become due, and whether the implied covenant to indemnify in S24 of the 1925 Act was limited to payments that the assignor was legally liable to make. Held: appeal dismissed, cross-appeal allowed. There is no need to serve default notices on former tenants for any unascertained uplift in rent which may become due on an outstanding rent review. A notice is only needed once the review has been determined and the current tenant does not pay the backdated arrears.
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note KA NTK
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element SCOTTISH AND NEWCASTLE PLC V RAGUZ
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element LANDLORD AND TENANT (COVENANTS) ACT 1995 S17
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element LAND REGISTRATION ACT 1925 S24
651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME
Geographic name England and Wales
Chronological subdivision 1543-
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-BREACHING BUSINESS TENANCIES
856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld/ldjudgmt.htm">https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld/ldjudgmt.htm</a>
Public note View the judgement free of charge at www.publications.parliament.uk...
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     Virtual Virtual Online 10/11/2008   ONLINE PUBLICATION 145801-1001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Law report