David Peakman v Linbrooke Services Limited (Record no. 81101)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01947cad a22001935a 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field L146250
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 081219e20081113xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u146250
041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title David Peakman v Linbrooke Services Limited
Medium [electronic resource]
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2008
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. [2008] EWCA Civ 1239, 13 November 2008. The case concerns proper allocation of claims. Linbrooke Services Limited (L) contracted with (P) to carry out work for it. P is a cable jointer. L was doing the work for the company Thales (T). P appealed against a decision to make no order for costs. P had claimed against L for no payment of work done, the costs of diesel fuel and of missing tools and damages for terminating contract without notice. L contested all the claims, and claimed that the contract was terminable at will. L counterclaimed damages for remedies to the defective works and for loss of contract with T because of the defective works. P obtained satisfaction, minus a reduction of 25%. L got 50% of his claims for defective work. P had to pay L £265 plus interest. P contested L's counterclaim about loss of profits on contracts. It claimed that, because of the T counterclaim, the case was allocated to the multi-track instead of the small claims track. "Held": P had to pay L. There was no evidence for the T counterclaim. So the case should have followed the small claims track. L's conduct brought to T more costs than necessary. The judge should have taken this into account when deciding about the costs. L should pay 50% of P's costs from the date the case was allocated to the multi-track.
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note KA
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element DAVID PEAKMAN V LINBROOKE SERVICES LIMITED
651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME
Geographic name England and Wales
Chronological subdivision 1543-
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION
856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/1239.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/1239.html</a>
Public note View the case free of charge at www.bailli.org...
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     Virtual Virtual Online 19/12/2008   ONLINE PUBLICATION 146250-2001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Law report