MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
| fixed length control field |
02298cab a22003255a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER |
| control field |
L146889 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
| fixed length control field |
090309e20090228xxk f v 000 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER |
| System control number |
(Sirsi) u146889 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title |
eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT |
| Title |
Dorrington Belgravia Ltd v McGlashan and another |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
2009 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
| Summary, etc. |
[2009] O8 EG 116, 12 November 2008. Illustrates the importance of defining the exact extent of the demise in a building's lease. A claimant landlord of residential maisonettes under a sublease who wanted to build a further storey above a roof with skylights, applied to the court for declarations that : (1) the roof and airspace above the maisonette were not demised to the defendants; (2) it was entitled to build even though this would block the skylights. The defendant tenants argued that by blocking the skylights some rooms would receive no natural light (although other rooms had windows). It also argued that the roof and airspace were part of the demise and that and any development would be trespass. The case turned very much on the design of the building in question. Held: application refused. The Central London County Court ruled that the skylights were an integral part of the design and structure of the property, so the roof was part of the demise. Further, although there was no express grant of a right to light in the lease, the tenants had a right to light by long use or implied grant. Blocking the skylights would be an infringement of this right to light. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) |
| Local note |
KA NTK |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
INVESTORS COMPENSATION SCHEME LTD V WEST BROMWICH BUILDING SOCIETY |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
DELEGABLE LTD V PERINPANATHAN |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
DAVIES V YADEGAR |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
STRAUDLEY INVESTMENTS V BARPRESS LTD |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
HATFIELD V MOSS |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
BROWNE V FLOWER |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
JOHNSTON & SONS LTD V HOLLAND |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
JOLLY V KINE |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
GALE ON EASEMENTS |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
OVERCOM PROPERTIES V STOCKLEIGH HALL RESIDENTS MANAGEMENT LTD |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
HANNON V 169 QUEEN'S GATE LTD |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
DEVONSHIRE REID PROPERTIES LTD V TRENEMAN |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME |
| Geographic name |
England and Wales |
| Chronological subdivision |
1543- |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
PROPERTY-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT-EASEMENTS-RIGHTS TO LIGHT DETERMINATION |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL LEASES |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
| Suppress in OPAC |
0 |