Penny and Anr v Digital Structures Ltd (Record no. 81327)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01919cad a22001935a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L146907 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090310e20090302xxk f v 000 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u146907 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 04 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Penny and Anr v Digital Structures Ltd |
| Medium | [electronic resource] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2009 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2009] EWCA Civ 144, 02 March 2009. The case turns around the dismissal of a case of negligence against a firm of structural engineers. The claimant Penny (P) bought a house and asked Digital Structures Ltd (D), a structural engineer firm, to conduct a structural survey of the south gable of the house. Th engineers declared the roof sound and well supported. Wanting to do some alterations, P engaged a builder who advised him to have the safety of the structure checked first. P asked another structural engineer, Mr Oliphant (O) for a second survey. O concluded that the roof was not properly supported and in the risk of collapsing. P decided to carry out works to remedy the problem and to sue D for negligence in not informing him that the roof was unsafe. D's expert witness, Professor Knapton (K) demonstrated that the roof was sound and solid at the time of the first survey. The judge found that the roof was properly supported. P appealed the judgment. He argued that there was a procedural irregularity. "Held": P?s counsel had the opportunity to discuss with O. There was no procedural irregularity. The judge concluded that, with the evidence provided, the explanation given by K was correct and that the roof was safe and properly supported at the time of the survey. The judge dismissed the appeal. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | KA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PENNY AND ANR V DIGITAL STRUCTURES LTD |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | England and Wales |
| Chronological subdivision | 1543- |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING PATHOLOGY |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2009/144.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2009/144.html</a> |
| Public note | View the case free of charge at www.bailli.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 10/03/2009 | ONLINE JUDGMENT | 146907-2001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |