Peter Ellis v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Chiltern District Council (Record no. 81470)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02361cad a22002295a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L147294 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090427e20090331xxk f v 000 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u147294 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 04 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Peter Ellis v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Chiltern District Council |
| Medium | [electronic resource] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2009 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2009] EWHC 634 (Admin), 31 March 2009. The case considers whether a certificate of lawfulness can be delivered when there is a sustained breach of a planning condition but which did not subsist at the date the application was made. Peter Ellis (E) applied to overturn two decisions taken by an inspector in relation to his house. Planning permission was granted for the dwelling in 1961, with the condition that it be occupied only by people employed in agriculture or forestry. The house has been inhabited since then with short periods of inoccupancy and in complete breach of that condition. In a time of inoccupancy, the previous owner applied for a certificate of lawfulness, on the basis that the breach had begun more than 10 years earlier. Chiltern District Council rejected this application and a later application for planning permission which sought to remove the occupancy condition. E appealed against these two rejections. The inspector appointed by the Secretary of State dismissed both appeals. E argued that a certificate of lawfulness should have been granted. "Held": application refused. The inspector had not erred in his application of Nicholson v Secretary of State for the Environment and Maldon District Council case. She had not applied the local plan policy mechanistically. She had expressed that there was no evidence that the area did not need agricultural dwelling and that H had to prove it, what he failed to do. Her reasons were proper. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | KA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PETER ELLIS V SOS FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND ANOR |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | NICHOLSON V SOS ENVIRONMENT & MALDON DC |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1968 |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | England and Wales |
| Chronological subdivision | 1543- |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-USE REQUIREMENTS |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2009/634.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2009/634.html</a> |
| Public note | View the case free of charge at www.bailli.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 27/04/2009 | ONLINE JUDGMENT | 147294-2001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |