UCB Corporate Services Ltd v Halifax (SW) Ltd and another
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2000] 16 EG 137-143(7)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: CA 17 February 2000. On 30 April 1999 second respondent surveyor on instructions of appellant bank U made a valuation of commercial premises for mortgage loan purposes. The report gave the open market value of the freehold as £665,000 on a 90-day sale basis with U as mortgagees in possession. U made a loan of £532,000 based on the valuation. Mortgagor fell into arrears and U took possession. They expected to sell the property for £325,000. U claimed for negligence. CA upheld CC's decision that the valuation was not negligent on the grounds that the actual open market value was £644,000 and that the appropriate margin of error was 10%. Held that it was reasonable for the second respondent not to have made a discount to allow for a 90-day sale by a mortgagee in possession. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS62239 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 105755-1001 |
CA 17 February 2000. On 30 April 1999 second respondent surveyor on instructions of appellant bank U made a valuation of commercial premises for mortgage loan purposes. The report gave the open market value of the freehold as £665,000 on a 90-day sale basis with U as mortgagees in possession. U made a loan of £532,000 based on the valuation. Mortgagor fell into arrears and U took possession. They expected to sell the property for £325,000. U claimed for negligence. CA upheld CC's decision that the valuation was not negligent on the grounds that the actual open market value was £644,000 and that the appropriate margin of error was 10%. Held that it was reasonable for the second respondent not to have made a discount to allow for a 90-day sale by a mortgagee in possession. Appeal dismissed.