P.G. Vallance Ltd v SoS for the Environment and Mole Valley DC
Language: English Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; 1994 JPL 50-55(6)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: QBD 13 October 1992. Enforcement notice - leave to appeal - collection of aircraft in green belt site - was there a point of law? - detailed consideration of decison letter - wording was open to critism but it did not amount to a misdirection such as would amount to a point of law - relevance of `the proviso` as used in the criminal context - Order 55 (rule7(7)) - difference between criminal appeals against a trial on indictment and planning appeals - single judge not bound to grant leave even if it was in circumstances where it was plain that as regards the decision as a whole no substantial wrong had benn occaisioned. (Headnote from journal)| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X1256 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 15845-1001 |
QBD 13 October 1992. Enforcement notice - leave to appeal - collection of aircraft in green belt site - was there a point of law? - detailed consideration of decison letter - wording was open to critism but it did not amount to a misdirection such as would amount to a point of law - relevance of `the proviso` as used in the criminal context - Order 55 (rule7(7)) - difference between criminal appeals against a trial on indictment and planning appeals - single judge not bound to grant leave even if it was in circumstances where it was plain that as regards the decision as a whole no substantial wrong had benn occaisioned. (Headnote from journal)