Regalbourne Ltd v East Lindsey DC
Language: English Series: Rating Appeals ; 1994 RA 1-12(12)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: CA 9 March 1993. The refusal of the High Court to allow appellant company for an extension of time to appeal against a Valuation and Community Charge Tribunal decision within the time limit laid down by the Rules of the Supreme Court Order 55 was upheld.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X1299 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 16076-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 9 March 1993. The refusal of the High Court to allow appellant company for an extension of time to appeal against a Valuation and Community Charge Tribunal decision within the time limit laid down by the Rules of the Supreme Court Order 55 was upheld.