Nahlis, Dickey and Morris v SoS Environment, RB Kensington and Chelsea, Southside Leisure Ltd and Maiden Outdoor Advertising Ltd
Language: English Series: Property and Compensation Reports ; [1996] 71 P&CR 553-565(7)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: QBD 23 November 1995. Royal Borough of Kensigton and Chelsea (X) had served discontinuance notices requiring use of a building for an advertising hoarding. Plaintiff solicitors (N) now practised from a different site, although they remained freehold owners of the premises. X sent nine identical notices to alternative addresses but the notices sent to N at the premises concerned were returned marked addressee unknown. An appeal against the notices on the merits only was rejected by SoS Environment."Held" that applicants had not been prejudiced by the convolutions of service or non- service or by the fact that SoS letter didn't carry a date. Application dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS55403 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 16200-1001 |
QBD 23 November 1995. Royal Borough of Kensigton and Chelsea (X) had served discontinuance notices requiring use of a building for an advertising hoarding. Plaintiff solicitors (N) now practised from a different site, although they remained freehold owners of the premises. X sent nine identical notices to alternative addresses but the notices sent to N at the premises concerned were returned marked addressee unknown. An appeal against the notices on the merits only was rejected by SoS Environment."Held" that applicants had not been prejudiced by the convolutions of service or non- service or by the fact that SoS letter didn't carry a date. Application dismissed.