Lloyds Bank Ltd v Rosset and Rosset
Language: English Series: New Law Journal ; 138(6358) 27 May 1988, 149-150(2)Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: CA 13 May 1988. When a wife claims that she has a beneficial interest in a house registered in her husband`s name and that her interest has priority over the rights of a mortgagee under a legal charge executed without her knowledge, then in order to claim the protection afforded to overriding interests by Land Registration Act 1925 s70(1)(g) , the wife must have been in actual occupation of the house when the charge was executed as distinct from being in occupation when the charge was registered.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS39423 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 16588-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 13 May 1988. When a wife claims that she has a beneficial interest in a house registered in her husband`s name and that her interest has priority over the rights of a mortgagee under a legal charge executed without her knowledge, then in order to claim the protection afforded to overriding interests by Land Registration Act 1925 s70(1)(g) , the wife must have been in actual occupation of the house when the charge was executed as distinct from being in occupation when the charge was registered.