Goodbye Junior Books
Language: English Series: New Law Journal ; 138(6344) 8 July 1988, 483-485(3)Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: Two recent Court of Appeal decisions Simaan General Contracting Co v Pilkington Glass Ltd (See Abstract 38904) and Greater Nottingham Co-operative Society v Cementation Piling and Foundations Ltd (See WB2415-19) appear to have overturned the Junior Books ruling that recovery of economic loss alone by the main contractor from the nominated subcontractor was possible. In this article, the author discusses the reasons why he welcomes this development.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS39444 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 16792-1001 |
Two recent Court of Appeal decisions Simaan General Contracting Co v Pilkington Glass Ltd (See Abstract 38904) and Greater Nottingham Co-operative Society v Cementation Piling and Foundations Ltd (See WB2415-19) appear to have overturned the Junior Books ruling that recovery of economic loss alone by the main contractor from the nominated subcontractor was possible. In this article, the author discusses the reasons why he welcomes this development.