North West Leicestershire DC and Hitchinson Microtel Ltd
Language: English Series: Planning Appeal Decisions ; (194) 9 PAD 252-259(8)Subject(s): Summary: Decision letter 16 November 1993. Location of telecommunication tower - conflicting requirements of protection of visial amenity and network need - alternative solutions proposed by council rejected by Inspector as technically unacceptable of likely to generate more harm to visual amenity that appellenant`s scheme - detrimental effect of scheme of SSSI considered to be not significant - appeal allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X1398 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 16817-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Decision letter 16 November 1993. Location of telecommunication tower - conflicting requirements of protection of visial amenity and network need - alternative solutions proposed by council rejected by Inspector as technically unacceptable of likely to generate more harm to visual amenity that appellenant`s scheme - detrimental effect of scheme of SSSI considered to be not significant - appeal allowed.