Kinsella and Kinsella V St Helens MBC
Language: English Series: Rating & Valuation Reporter ; [1996] RVR 144-146(3)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: LT 25 January 1995. Council sought a determination of the compensation to be paid in respect of the acquisition of a long leasehold interest in 91 and 93 Earle Street. In dispute was whether K had occupied no. 91 for the purpose of a business and therefore qualified for a supplement under the Housing Act 1985 sch 24 and secondly, the value of the building because no. 91 was used for storing materials while no. 93 was renovated. The value of the renovated house was set at £30,000 and the value of the other at £3000. "Held" compensation for no. 91 to remain at £3000 as it was not established that the property was used for business purposes during the whole of the qualifying period.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS55498 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 16964-1001 |
LT 25 January 1995. Council sought a determination of the compensation to be paid in respect of the acquisition of a long leasehold interest in 91 and 93 Earle Street. In dispute was whether K had occupied no. 91 for the purpose of a business and therefore qualified for a supplement under the Housing Act 1985 sch 24 and secondly, the value of the building because no. 91 was used for storing materials while no. 93 was renovated. The value of the renovated house was set at £30,000 and the value of the other at £3000. "Held" compensation for no. 91 to remain at £3000 as it was not established that the property was used for business purposes during the whole of the qualifying period.