Williams v Blaenau Gwent BC
Language: English Series: Property and Compensation Reports ; (1994) 67 PCR 393-401(9)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: LT 21 March 1994. W sought compensation under Land Compensation Act 1961 s31 for loss sustained due to the service and withdrawal of a notice to treat affecting land W used for his business. B claimed that the LT had no jurisdiction to determine the case and W was estopped from this additional claim by his county court action for professional fees in connection with this matter. Held, that although the notice to treat had not been withdrawn in accordance with s31 there was no reason why W should not enter an agreement with B to withdraw the notice on payment of such compensation as would have been due under s31. The decision was within the LT authority. Also held that the county court decision had not affected this claim.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS51245 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 16975-1001 |
LT 21 March 1994. W sought compensation under Land Compensation Act 1961 s31 for loss sustained due to the service and withdrawal of a notice to treat affecting land W used for his business. B claimed that the LT had no jurisdiction to determine the case and W was estopped from this additional claim by his county court action for professional fees in connection with this matter. Held, that although the notice to treat had not been withdrawn in accordance with s31 there was no reason why W should not enter an agreement with B to withdraw the notice on payment of such compensation as would have been due under s31. The decision was within the LT authority. Also held that the county court decision had not affected this claim.