Swann v White and others
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; [1996] 26 EG 136-138(3)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: LT 14 November 1995. W were the lessees of property owned by S. Following notices served by W under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 claiming to acquire the freeholds to the properties, the Leasehold valuation tribunal determined the price of each property to be £350. S appealed contending the price should be £525. W supported the LVT`s decision and did not call any expert evidence to support the decision. S contended that in the absence of expert evidence from W, the tribunal must accept the evidence of the freeholder. "Decision" the appeal decision in "London and Winchester Properties Ltd" did not state that the landlord`s evidence must be accepted if unchallenged. The tribunal was entitled to set the purchase prices.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS55557 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 17305-1001 |
LT 14 November 1995. W were the lessees of property owned by S. Following notices served by W under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 claiming to acquire the freeholds to the properties, the Leasehold valuation tribunal determined the price of each property to be £350. S appealed contending the price should be £525. W supported the LVT`s decision and did not call any expert evidence to support the decision. S contended that in the absence of expert evidence from W, the tribunal must accept the evidence of the freeholder. "Decision" the appeal decision in "London and Winchester Properties Ltd" did not state that the landlord`s evidence must be accepted if unchallenged. The tribunal was entitled to set the purchase prices.