Willison v Cheverell Estates Ltd and another
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; [1996] EG 133-135(2)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: CA 15 June 1995. Lease of business premises at a rent which was subject to an upwards-only review. Reviewed rent was to be determined on the assumption that the premises were being let for a term equal to the length of the term of the actual lease. C served notice to determine the term in accordance with the provisions of a break clause for redevelopment purposes and served a notice to determine under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s25. C obtained a declaration that it was entitled to operate the rent review clause. W appealed. "Held" the expression `term` in the rent review clause could not be construed as meaning during the continuation of the tenancy. Appeal allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS55561 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 17322-1001 |
CA 15 June 1995. Lease of business premises at a rent which was subject to an upwards-only review. Reviewed rent was to be determined on the assumption that the premises were being let for a term equal to the length of the term of the actual lease. C served notice to determine the term in accordance with the provisions of a break clause for redevelopment purposes and served a notice to determine under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s25. C obtained a declaration that it was entitled to operate the rent review clause. W appealed. "Held" the expression `term` in the rent review clause could not be construed as meaning during the continuation of the tenancy. Appeal allowed.