Note locks the door on rival retail plans
Language: English Series: Planning (for the Natural and Built Environment) ; (1178) 19 July 1996, 8-9(2)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: Suggests that the revised PPG6 contains several contradictions, such as how local authorities are advised to assess need for retail developments whilst adopting a sequential approach. Criticises the PPG for the `special treatment` of discount stores, differing aims for car parking provision, and the lack of recognition for the distinctive roles of out-of-town and town centre location, with a danger of placing undue emphasis on a town centre strategy.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS55586 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 17434-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Suggests that the revised PPG6 contains several contradictions, such as how local authorities are advised to assess need for retail developments whilst adopting a sequential approach. Criticises the PPG for the `special treatment` of discount stores, differing aims for car parking provision, and the lack of recognition for the distinctive roles of out-of-town and town centre location, with a danger of placing undue emphasis on a town centre strategy.