Brentwood BC v SoS Environment and Gray
Language: English Series: Property and Compensation Reports ; [1996] 72 P&CR 61-69(5)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: QBD 1 March 1996. G owned a house which lay within the metropolitan green belt and a Special Landscape Area. An outbuilding was erected 2 metres away from the house. An application for planning permission was refused on the grounds that the building was in a metropolitan green belt and that the building was detrimental to the surrounding character and visual amenities. G appealed against the refusal of planning permission and the subsequent enforcement notice. Inspector quashed the enforcement notice and allowed planning permission. SoS challenged his decision. "Held" the Inspector`s decision was defective. He failed properly to understand and apply relevant policy.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS55595 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 17479-1001 |
QBD 1 March 1996. G owned a house which lay within the metropolitan green belt and a Special Landscape Area. An outbuilding was erected 2 metres away from the house. An application for planning permission was refused on the grounds that the building was in a metropolitan green belt and that the building was detrimental to the surrounding character and visual amenities. G appealed against the refusal of planning permission and the subsequent enforcement notice. Inspector quashed the enforcement notice and allowed planning permission. SoS challenged his decision. "Held" the Inspector`s decision was defective. He failed properly to understand and apply relevant policy.