New law creates a contract nightmare

By:

Lewison, K

Language: English Series: Property Week ; 56(3) 19 July 1996, 21(1)Publication details: 1996Subject(s):

Summary: Criticises the CA`s finding for the defendant in "McCausland v SIS Securities" that an informal variation to contract for sale is not valid. Highlights contractual implications under the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 s2.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	ABS55606 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	17536-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	ABS55603 Where angels fear to tread	ABS55604 A fair fee for the job	ABS55605 Denning`s doctrine rides to the rescue	ABS55606 New law creates a contract nightmare	ABS55607 Part performance may still exist	ABS55608 Woolwich Building Society v Dickman and another	ABS55609 Comparing net with gross rents	Next

Criticises the CA`s finding for the defendant in "McCausland v SIS Securities" that an informal variation to contract for sale is not valid. Highlights contractual implications under the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 s2.

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)