Woolwich Building Society v Dickman and another
Language: English Series: All England Law Reports ; [1996] 3 AllER 204-214(5)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: CA 15 February 1996. D purchased a leasehold flat and granted a protected tenancy to T. On application D received a later mortgage offer from W on the mistaken understanding that D shared right of occupation with T, and conditional on T signing consent forms to postponement of their rights of occupancy in favour of those of W. When D defaulted W brought proceedings for possession. T resisted on grounds that the consent forms were ineffective and that they held a protected tenancy which prohibited such action. W`s appeal against an earlier ruling in favour of T was dismissed. Whilst T`s claim against the consent forms was invalid, they held possessional rights under their protected tenancy.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS55608 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 17548-1001 |
CA 15 February 1996. D purchased a leasehold flat and granted a protected tenancy to T. On application D received a later mortgage offer from W on the mistaken understanding that D shared right of occupation with T, and conditional on T signing consent forms to postponement of their rights of occupancy in favour of those of W. When D defaulted W brought proceedings for possession. T resisted on grounds that the consent forms were ineffective and that they held a protected tenancy which prohibited such action. W`s appeal against an earlier ruling in favour of T was dismissed. Whilst T`s claim against the consent forms was invalid, they held possessional rights under their protected tenancy.