Lewis v Christchurch BC; Lewis v Vivian
Language: English Series: Rating Appeals ; [1996] RA 229-237(5)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: QBD 18 March 1996. Beach huts were included individually in the valuation list as dwellings. Valuation tribunal directed removal from list. Listing officer appealed. "Held" inclusion of the beach huts in the valuation list must be reinstated because the findings of fact, the evidence and the relevant statutory provisions all pointed unerringly to the conclusion that the beach huts were separate dwellings.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS55619 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 17605-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
QBD 18 March 1996. Beach huts were included individually in the valuation list as dwellings. Valuation tribunal directed removal from list. Listing officer appealed. "Held" inclusion of the beach huts in the valuation list must be reinstated because the findings of fact, the evidence and the relevant statutory provisions all pointed unerringly to the conclusion that the beach huts were separate dwellings.