Oades and another v Eke (VO)
Series: Rating Appeals ; [2004] RA 161-170(6)Publication details: 2004Subject(s): Summary: RA/17/2003, 22 March 2004. Appeal by ratepayers (O) against a LVT decision which held that holiday chalets together with store and premises should be assessed as separate hereditaments rather than a single rateable unit. O argued that the accommodation units were caravans within the terms of the Non-Domestic Rating (Caravan Sites) Regulations 1990 and the Caravan Sites and Control of Development Act 1960 s29. LT held that the chalets were not caravans within the Regulations on the grounds that the chalets were not capable of being moved from one place to another. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS68282 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 127065-1001 |
RA/17/2003, 22 March 2004. Appeal by ratepayers (O) against a LVT decision which held that holiday chalets together with store and premises should be assessed as separate hereditaments rather than a single rateable unit. O argued that the accommodation units were caravans within the terms of the Non-Domestic Rating (Caravan Sites) Regulations 1990 and the Caravan Sites and Control of Development Act 1960 s29. LT held that the chalets were not caravans within the Regulations on the grounds that the chalets were not capable of being moved from one place to another. Appeal dismissed.