The case for contractors

By:

Davies, L

Language: English Series: Building ; 261(7944) 30 August 1996, 27(1)Publication details: 1996Subject(s):

Summary: Discusses "Tarmac Construction Ltd v Esso Petroleum Company Ltd" 1996 allowing an engineer`s decision to be revised unlike "Balfour Beatty Civil Engineering v Docklands Light Railway" 1996. Explains differences between decisions.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	ABS55655 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	17811-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	ABS55652 Downcast forecasts	ABS55653 Cost of repair or diminution of value: an intermediate measure (or, the too shallow deep end and how both sides) lost	ABS55654 Should we be so retentive?	ABS55655 The case for contractors	ABS55656 Phew! what a scorcher	ABS55657 Windows and doors	ABS55658 Blade runners	Next

Discusses "Tarmac Construction Ltd v Esso Petroleum Company Ltd" 1996 allowing an engineer`s decision to be revised unlike "Balfour Beatty Civil Engineering v Docklands Light Railway" 1996. Explains differences between decisions.

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)