Confidentiality cannot always be guaranteed
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0449) 4 December 2004, 126-128(3)Publication details: 2004Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: Defines and clarifies differences between disclosure and privilege using examples of Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 scenarios as illustrations. Discusses the implications of "Three Rivers DC v Bank of England" ([2004] UKHL 48) which clearly defines the boundaries relating to legal advice privilege. Warns that confidentiality cannot always be guaranteed. View judgment at www.publications.parliament.uk.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS68559 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 128274-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Defines and clarifies differences between disclosure and privilege using examples of Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 scenarios as illustrations. Discusses the implications of "Three Rivers DC v Bank of England" ([2004] UKHL 48) which clearly defines the boundaries relating to legal advice privilege. Warns that confidentiality cannot always be guaranteed. View judgment at www.publications.parliament.uk.