Use as agricultural holding
Language: English Series: Times ; 6 October 1995, 38(1)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: "City of Aberdeen DC v Ben Reid & Co Ltd" (Outer House of the Court of Session) was concerned with whether or not a garden centre was an agricultural holding, and depended on the relative use made of the land. (Scotland).| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3137-58 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 17964-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3133-36 Planning appeals - costs | WB3136-45 Notice under lease | WB3137-48 What`s in a word? | WB3137-58 Use as agricultural holding | WB3138-43 Action for damp problem is statute barred | WB3138-64 Local centre consent | WB3139-36 Future rents |
"City of Aberdeen DC v Ben Reid & Co Ltd" (Outer House of the Court of Session) was concerned with whether or not a garden centre was an agricultural holding, and depended on the relative use made of the land. (Scotland).