Weintraub v London Borough of Hackney
Language: English Publication details: [2024] EWHC 845 (Ch), Chancery Division, 16 April 2024Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: On 21 March 2024, Mr Justice Zacarroli delivered a judgment in the ChD. An individual who had a secure tenancy of a council flat wanted to exercise their right to buy under the Housing Act 1985 s.118 after not being in residence for a long period, their intention to return to the property as their only home, even though that was to happen only once they had exercised their right to buy the property, was sufficient to satisfy the tenant condition in s.81.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE JUDGMENT (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available |
Browsing Virtual shelves, Shelving location: Online Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| ONLINE JUDGMENT Abbey Healthcare v Augusta 2008 LLP (formerly Simply Construct) [2024] UKSC 23 | ONLINE JUDGMENT Charlton v Forrest | ONLINE JUDGMENT Richmond upon Thames LBC v R. (on the application of Ariyo) | ONLINE JUDGMENT Weintraub v London Borough of Hackney | ONLINE JUDGMENT Spire Property Development LLP v Withers LLP | ONLINE JUDGMENT Smoke House & Curing House, 18 Remus Road | ONLINE JUDGMENT Hazelwood Properties Limited v London Borough of Camden |
On 21 March 2024, Mr Justice Zacarroli delivered a judgment in the ChD. An individual who had a secure tenancy of a council flat wanted to exercise their right to buy under the Housing Act 1985 s.118 after not being in residence for a long period, their intention to return to the property as their only home, even though that was to happen only once they had exercised their right to buy the property, was sufficient to satisfy the tenant condition in s.81.