Chifley Holdings Ltd (BVI) v HMRC [electronic resource]
Language: English Publication details: Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) [2024] UKUT 00301 25 September 2024Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2024] UKUT 00301 (LC). An appeal decision on the valuation of a multi-million-pound West End London home for the purposes of the Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings (‘ATED’), an annual tax payable by companies that own UK residential property worth more than £500k. In finding that the property was worth more than £10m as argued by HMRC, the Upper Tribunal considered the relevance of and weight to be given to post-valuation date evidence, holding that while events after the valuation date which could not have been known to the valuer or hypothetical buyer should not be taken into account, post-transaction sales can be used to inform the valuer as to the state of the market at the time of the valuation.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE JUDGMENT (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available |
Browsing Virtual shelves, Shelving location: Online Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
[2024] UKUT 00301 (LC). An appeal decision on the valuation of a multi-million-pound West End London home for the purposes of the Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings (‘ATED’), an annual tax payable by companies that own UK residential property worth more than £500k.
In finding that the property was worth more than £10m as argued by HMRC, the Upper Tribunal considered the relevance of and weight to be given to post-valuation date evidence, holding that while events after the valuation date which could not have been known to the valuer or hypothetical buyer should not be taken into account, post-transaction sales can be used to inform the valuer as to the state of the market at the time of the valuation.