Hammersmith and Fulham v SoS for Environment and Davison
Language: English Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; 1994 JPL 957-961(5)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: QBD 30 November 1993. Enforcement notice quashed on appeal. Errection of boundary railings. External staircase for access to roof terrace. Staircasee found be be within Class A of the GDO 1988. Railings and trellis found to be within Class B. Whether something was an alteration to the roof within Class A was an issue of fact. As regards Class C, alteration to the shape of a dwelling -house meant more than just external appearance otherwide Class C otiose due to section 52(2)(a)- railings and trellis- the `existing roof` referred to the roof of the house as a whole and not some limited part thereof.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X1690 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 18706-1001 |
QBD 30 November 1993. Enforcement notice quashed on appeal. Errection of boundary railings. External staircase for access to roof terrace. Staircasee found be be within Class A of the GDO 1988. Railings and trellis found to be within Class B. Whether something was an alteration to the roof within Class A was an issue of fact. As regards Class C, alteration to the shape of a dwelling -house meant more than just external appearance otherwide Class C otiose due to section 52(2)(a)- railings and trellis- the `existing roof` referred to the roof of the house as a whole and not some limited part thereof.