Hart DC v Mundy

Language: English Series: Planning Appeal Decisions ; (1994) 9 PAD 562-564(20Publication details: 1994Subject(s):

PLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW

Summary: Enforcement notice - reduction in height of fence from 2.1m to 1.8m - whether breach of planning control - whether replacement of of vandalised fence - whether retrospective planning applications served useful purpose. (Headnote from summary).

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Law report	London Journal article	X1698 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	18757-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	X1695 Design control in Europe	X1696 Housing issues in the 1930s: slum clearance, overcrowding and the role of housing associations	X1697 Kettering BC v Button	X1698 Hart DC v Mundy	X1699 East Yorkshire BC v Spencers	X17 FIDIC in the Gulf : a comparison of the particular conditions and changes to the FIDIC conditions of contract as used in Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates	X170 Autocratic pilot holds H&B on course	Next

Enforcement notice - reduction in height of fence from 2.1m to 1.8m - whether breach of planning control - whether replacement of of vandalised fence - whether retrospective planning applications served useful purpose. (Headnote from summary).

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)