Is a breach of covenant capable of remedy?
Language: English Series: Solicitors` Journal ; 140(35) 20 September 1996, 898-899(2)Publication details: 1996Subject(s):- BILLSON AND OTHERS V RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS LTD
- BREACH OF COVENANT
- EXPERT CLOTHING SERVICE V HILLGATE HOUSE
- FORFEITURE NOTICES
- GLASS V KENCAKES LTD
- LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S146
- NEGATIVE COVENANTS
- POSITIVE COVENANTS
- RUGBY SCHOOL (GOVERNORS) V TANNAHILL
- S146 NOTICES
- SAVVA V HOUSSEIN
- SCALA HOUSE & DISTRICT PROPERTY CO LTD V FORBES
- Landlord and tenant
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS55827 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 19002-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Uses case law to illustrate the current trend of adopting a practical approach in deciding whether a breach of covenant is capable of remedy. Outlines Section 146 drafting points.