Bromley LBC v SoS Environment and J P Whelan & Sons (Construction) Ltd
Language: English Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; (1994) JPL 1095-1103(5)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: QBD 13 January 1994. Redundant agricultural buildings- use of yard- application of PPG2 guidance on redundant buildings- application of Pehrsson - first case to address re-use of redundant buildings and adjacent land- paragraph 16 of PPG2 did not refer to the carrying on of a primary use on open land no matter whether the land was adjacent to a redundant building or not- was required to be `a use appropriate to a rural area` within the meaning of para 13- Inspector wrong in treating Pehrsson as if it determined what the PPG2 advice was with respect to land outside redundant buildings- the Inspector had made his decision about the building without regard to the open land. Appeal allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X1761 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 19094-1001 |
QBD 13 January 1994. Redundant agricultural buildings- use of yard- application of PPG2 guidance on redundant buildings- application of Pehrsson - first case to address re-use of redundant buildings and adjacent land- paragraph 16 of PPG2 did not refer to the carrying on of a primary use on open land no matter whether the land was adjacent to a redundant building or not- was required to be `a use appropriate to a rural area` within the meaning of para 13- Inspector wrong in treating Pehrsson as if it determined what the PPG2 advice was with respect to land outside redundant buildings- the Inspector had made his decision about the building without regard to the open land. Appeal allowed.